Binance, the leading cryptocurrency platform, has released an overview of global stablecoin regulation, as revealed to Finbold on Tuesday, October 15.
The current state of stablecoin regulation
Meant to maintain stable value by being pegged to traditional currencies and assets, stablecoins are gaining traction worldwide.
Consequently, regulatory landscapes are evolving rapidly across major jurisdictions such as the US, EU, Singapore, and Dubai, which seek to ensure both innovation and consumer protection.
Picks for you
Key events, like Facebook’s Libra project (later rebranded as Diem) in 2019 and the plummet of TerraUSD in 2022, have accelerated regulatory action against stablecoins.
Libra’s potential impact on global finance, for example, pushed regulators toward new stability and consumer protection frameworks, while the collapse of TerraUSD painted a picture of the risks associated with algorithmic stablecoins.
In response, the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework has banned algorithmic stablecoins, while the US is exploring a comprehensive federal framework.
Other nations, like Singapore and Dubai, are likewise crafting detailed guidelines to ensure safe stablecoin operations within their financial ecosystems.
The MiCA regulation, for instance, sets distinct classifications and rules for electronic money tokens (EMTs) and asset-referenced tokens (ARTs) to promote stablecoin growth while maintaining financial stability.
Stablecoin-specific regulations
Different types of stablecoins fall under varying regulatory lenses, Binance reports.
Fiat-linked stablecoins face the most regulation, with frequent challenges in regard to licensing, reserve, and compliance standards in the realm of, for example, anti-money laundering (AML).
On the other hand, the less scrutinized asset-backed stablecoins are diversifying with collateral including real-world assets.
Algorithmic stablecoins, however, have largely been undercollateralized because of their higher risk profiles, and countries like the UK and Japan are turning to specialized regulatory approaches to address this issue.
The UK, for example, which initially focused on fiat-backed stablecoins, now has plans to address other stablecoin types in the future, including foreign stablecoins that operate within UK payment systems.
Japan, thanks to its Payment Services Act, allows only banks and certain service providers to issue stablecoins.
In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the Central Bank of UAE (CBUAE) has taken control of stablecoin regulation, setting guidelines for dirham-backed and foreign currency-backed tokens.
Singapore, on the other hand, has introduced rules for single-currency stablecoins pegged to the Singapore Dollar or G10 currencies, emphasizing reserve requirements, capital, and redemption guarantees.
