150

Ethereum users suffer over 10,000 failed transactions costing $4 million in fees on ‘Otherside’ mint

Ethereum users suffer over 10,000 failed transactions costing $4 million in fees on ‘Otherside’ mint
Jordan
Major
2 months ago
3 mins read

On April 30, Yuga Labs, the creators of Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC), launched their much anticipated “Otherside” metaverse land non-fungible tokens (NFT) mint on Ethereum. 

Even though the Yuga Labs team stated before the launch that they were taking precautions to “dramatically soften the potential for a massive gas war,” the mint ended up producing the highest gas surge in the history of Ethereum, with daily average gas prices reaching over 800 GWEI over $150 million spent on gas fees during the mint, according to data from Coin Metrics.

ETH gas price: Source: Coin Metrics

The frantic drive to mint resulted in a significant number of transactions that did not go through. Over 10,000 unsuccessful transactions and over $4 million in failed transaction fees were incurred by users who attempted to mint but set the gas price too low, resulting in their transaction not being validated before supplies ran out.

Mint attempts: Source: takenstheorem

Since payments from unsuccessful transactions cannot be recovered directly, Yuga Labs has committed to refunding the fees from their own pockets to individuals who have been impacted.

Why are the ETH gas fees so expensive?

Each time an Ethereum transaction is sent, users essentially determine the maximum gas price they are prepared to pay. The gas price impacts just the price the consumer pays per unit of gas used; it has no effect on the quantity of gas required to complete the transaction. 

Multiple variables contributed to the enormous gas increase and ETH burn that occurred during the Otherside land launch. As a starting point, the smart contract employed throughout the minting process was not optimized for the gas economy. Optimizations alone might have saved tens of millions of dollars in transaction fees.

In addition, and perhaps more significantly, as Vitalik Buterin pointed out, the mint design had a fatal flaw: Yuga Labs set a fixed price for each mint of 305 ApeCoin (APE) rather than establishing a system that would allow the market to determine a reasonable price for each mint.

Despite the fact that Yuga Labs performed KYC and restricted the initial wave of mints to two NFTs per address, demand nevertheless outstripped supply, resulting in a situation where not everyone who wanted to mint was allowed to do so. 

As a result, market players competed based on the price of gas, attempting to outbid one another and be the first in line to claim mint land before the supply ran out completely.

Latest News

Join us on Twitter or Telegram

Or follow us on Flipboard Flipboard

Like the article? Vote up or share on your social media

Recommended content

Weekly Finance Digest

By subscribing you agree with Finbold T&C’s

Jordan Major
Author

Jordan is an investor and market analyst. He's passionate about stocks, ETFs, blockchain, and digital assets. At Finbold.com, he delves into the technicalities to obtain future trends for new market traders and gives insights into user-friendly platforms for beginners.

AD